Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 584 (1979)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 296 N.C. 584 (1979), 296 N.C. 584 (N.C. 1979)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1979-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 584 (1979)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1979 ELLIOTT v. POTTS No. 174 P.C. Case below: 38 N.C. App. 743. Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31 denied 5 February 1979.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 584 (1979). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,296 N.C. 584(1979)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1979
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 5 February 1979.
FOX v. MILLER No. 138 P.C. Case below:38 N.C. App. 391.
Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 5 February 1979.
HARMON v. PUGH No. 165 P.C. Case below:38 N.C. App. 438.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 5 February 1979.
IN RE DALE No. 4 P.C. Case below: 39 N.C. App. 390 [39 N.C. App. 370].
Petition by respondent for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 5 February 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 February 1979.
IN RE KIRKMAN No. 161 P.C. Case below:38 N.C. App. 515.
Petition by Kirkman for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 5 February 1979. Motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 February 1979.Page 585