Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 411 (1979)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 296 N.C. 411 (1979), 296 N.C. 411 (N.C. 1979)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1979-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 411 (1979)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1979 HOGAN v. MOTOR LINES No. 137 PC. Case below: 38 N.C. App. 288. Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31 denied 4 January 1979.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 296 N.C. 411 (1979). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,296 N.C. 411(1979)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1979
Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1979.
HOLBROOK v. HOLBROOK No. 134 PC. Case below:38 N.C. App. 303.38 N.C. App. 308.
Petitions by Verna Holbrook for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1979.
IN RE BOYLES No. 135 PC. Case below:38 N.C. App. 389.
Petition by respondent for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 January 1979.
MANUFACTURING CO. v. MANUFACTURING CO. No. 142 PC. Case below:38 N.C. App. 393.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1979. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 January 1979.
SIPE v. BLANKENSHIP No. 141 PC. Case below:37 N.C. App. 499.
Petition by defendants for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 January 1979.Page 412