Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 290 N.C. 94 (1976)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 290 N.C. 94 (1976), 290 N.C. 94 (N.C. 1976)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1976-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 290 N.C. 94 (1976)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1976 ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MYERLY and EQUIPMENT CO. v. MYERLY No. 149 PC. Case below: 29 N.C. App. 85.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 290 N.C. 94 (1976). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,290 N.C. 94(1976)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1976
Petition for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 1 June 1976. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
BANK v. POCOCK No. 139 PC. Case below:29 N.C. App. 52.
Petition for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 1 June 1976.
FREEWOOD ASSOCIATES v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT No. 120 PC. Case below:28 N.C. App. 717.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 1 June 1976. Defendant's motion to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 June 1976.
HOWARD v. HAMILTON and HOWARD v. FAIRLEY No. 105 PC. Case below:28 N.C. App. 670.
Petition for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31denied 1 June 1976.
NASCO EQUIPMENT CO. v. MASON No. 133 PC. Case below:29 N.C. App. 185.
Petition for discretionary review under G.S.7A-31allowed 1 June 1976.Page 95