Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 68 Or. App. 385 (1984)
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 68 Or. App. 385 (1984), 68 Or. App. 385 (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1984-01-01
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 68 Or. App. 385 (1984) PER CURIAM OPINIONSOregon Court of Appeals. May, 1984 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] May 9, 1984 Amacher et al v. Cupp (A29018). Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 68 Or. App. 385 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PER CURIAM OPINIONS,68 Or. App. 385(1984)
PER CURIAM OPINIONS
Oregon Court of Appeals.
May, 1984
May 9, 1984
Amacher et al v. Cupp (A29018).
Affirmed.See Atkeson v. Cupp,68 Or. App. 196,680 P.2d 722(1984). (680 P.2d 725,rev den297 Or. 546)
Dee et al v. Cupp (A28961).
Affirmed.See Atkeson v. Cupp,68 Or. App. 196,680 P.2d 722(1984). (680 P.2d 725,rev den297 Or. 458,546)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Reese, Milo L., Claimant. Reese v. Industrial Indemnity Co. et al (A28167).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.Wright v.Industrial Indemnity,68 Or. App. 302,680 P.2d 1018(1984).
May 16, 1984
State v. Dimmick, Daniel Neal (A30321).
The state confesses error. Reversed and remanded for resentencing. (681 P.2d 179)
State v. Miller, Jeff Ray (A31064).
Reversed and remanded for new trial. ORS19.130(3). (681 P.2d 180)Page 386
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩