Opinion · Orlaw Oregon
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 61 Or. App. 227 (1982)
61 Or. App. 227
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Orlaw Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Orlaw
- Date
- 1982-12-22
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 61 Or. App. 227 (1982) PER CURIAM OPINIONSOregon Court of Appeals. December 22, 1982. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] In the Matter of the Estate of Mallicott, Raymond, L., aka Mallicott, Ray L., Deceased. Bisbee v. Mallicott et al; Bisbee v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 61 Or. App. 227 (1982). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PER CURIAM OPINIONS,61 Or. App. 227(1982)
PER CURIAM OPINIONS
Oregon Court of Appeals.
December 22, 1982.
In the Matter of the Estate of Mallicott, Raymond, L., aka Mallicott, Ray L., Deceased. Bisbee v. Mallicott et al; Bisbee v. Mallicott (A21061). Former opinion dated December 15, 1982, withdrawn; appeal dismissed as to respondent Frank W. King; opinion inBisbee v. Mallicott,58 Or. App. 749,650 P.2d 1098(1982), vacated as to that respondent.See Bisbee v. Mallicott,293 Or. 797,653 P.2d 239(1982). (655 P.2d 227)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Ferris, Herb, Claimant. Ferris v. Willamette Industries et al (A24510). Reversed; referee's order reinstated.See Bowman v. OregonTransfer,33 Or. App. 241,576 P.2d 27,rev den284 Or. 521(1978). (655 P.2d 226,rev den294 Or. 569)
In the Matter of the Marriage of Knoll and Knoll (A25285). Respondent — cross-appellant's motion to reinstate the cross-appeal is allowed.Henson and Henson,61 Or. App. 210,656 P.2d 345(1982). (655 P.2d 228)Page 228
In the Matter of the Compensation of Ferris, Herb, Claimant. Ferris v. Willamette Industries et al (A24510). Reversed; referee's order reinstated.See Bowman v. OregonTransfer,33 Or. App. 241,576 P.2d 27,rev den284 Or. 521(1978). (655 P.2d 226,rev den294 Or. 569)
December 29, 1982
State v. Rucker, Harold Oscar (A24197). Affirmed.State v.Doty,60 Or. App. 297,655 P.2d 276(1982). (655 P.2d 227,rev den294 Or. 569)
In the Matter of the Marriage of Knoll and Knoll (A25285). Respondent — cross-appellant's motion to reinstate the cross-appeal is allowed.Henson and Henson,61 Or. App. 210,656 P.2d 345(1982). (655 P.2d 228)Page 228
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩