PER CURIAM OPINIONS, 52 Or. App. 599 (1981)

In the Matter of the Marriage of Holm and Holm (18809). Affirmed. No costs to either party.Smith and Smith,290 Or. 567,624 P.2d 114(1981);Ditto and Ditto,52 Or. App. 609,628 P.2d 777(1981);Padbury and Padbury,46 Or. App. 533,612 P.2d 321(1980). (628 P.2d 793) Stogsdill, William v. Cupp (19839). Affirmed.State v.Elmore,24 Or. App. 651,546 P.2d 1117,rev den(1976);Michael M. v. Superior Court,450 U.S. 464,101 S Ct 1200,67 L Ed2d 437(1981). (629 P.2d 421,revden291 Or. 514)

State v. Keller, Richard (18794). Affirmed.State v.Corpuz,49 Or. App. 811,621 P.2d 604(1980) (holding that the language of ORS163.175(1)(c) "under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life" is not unconstitutionally vague). Identical language in ORS163.118(1)(a) is challenged for vagueness by defendant's demurrer here. (629 P.2d 422)Page 600