Opinion · Milaw Michigan
PEOPLE v. MADYUN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Mich., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDUALLAH LUKEMANMADYUN, a/k/a LUKEMAN A. MADYUN, Defendant-Appellant., 692 N.W.2d 385 (Mich. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Milaw Michigan
- Jurisdiction
- Milaw
- Date
- 2005-01-31
- Topic
- general
PEOPLE v. MADYUN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005) 692 N.W.2d 385 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDUALLAH LUKEMANMADYUN, a/k/a LUKEMAN A. MADYUN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 126783.Supreme Court of Michigan.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. MADYUN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PEOPLE v. MADYUN,472 Mich. 862(2005)
692 N.W.2d 385
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDUALLAH LUKEMAN
MADYUN, a/k/a LUKEMAN A. MADYUN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 126783.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 31, 2005.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.