Opinion · Nylaw New York

PEOPLE v. KAPLAN, GREENBERG, 264 N.Y. 675 (1934)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y., Respondent, v. SAM KAPLAN andTHEODORE GREENBERG, Appellants, Impleaded with Others., 264 N.Y. 675 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1934-06-05
Topic: general

PEOPLE v. KAPLAN, GREENBERG, 264 N.Y. 675 (1934) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAM KAPLAN andTHEODORE GREENBERG, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 24, 1934 Decided June 5, 1934 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. Max D. Steuer and Irving J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. KAPLAN, GREENBERG, 264 N.Y. 675 (1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLEv.KAPLAN, GREENBERG,264 N.Y. 675(1934)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,v.SAM KAPLAN and

THEODORE GREENBERG, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 24, 1934

Decided June 5, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.Page 676

Max D. SteuerandIrving J. Levyfor appellants.William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney(Robert C. TaylorandFelix C. Benvengaof counsel), for respondent.

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.