Opinion · Milaw Michigan

PEOPLE v. CAMBURN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Mich., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRACY LEIGHCAMBURN, Defendant-Appellant., 692 N.W.2d 384 (Mich. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2005-01-31
Topic: general

PEOPLE v. CAMBURN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005) 692 N.W.2d 384 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRACY LEIGHCAMBURN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 127496 (44)(45).Supreme Court of Michigan. January 31, 2005.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. CAMBURN, 472 Mich. 862 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLE v. CAMBURN,472 Mich. 862(2005)

692 N.W.2d 384

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRACY LEIGH

CAMBURN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 127496 (44)(45).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 31, 2005.

SC: 127496, COA: 246786, Ottawa CC: 01-025251-FC.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration, the motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages, and the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion for immediate consideration and the motion to file brief in excess of fifty pages are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.