Opinion · Nylaw New York

PEOPLE v. BAGLIO, 226 App. Div. 721 (1929)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y., Appellant, v. SAMUEL BAGLIO,Respondent., 226 A.D. 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1929)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1929-01-01
Topic
general

PEOPLE v. BAGLIO, 226 App. Div. 721 (1929) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SAMUEL BAGLIO,Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. March, 1929.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. BAGLIO, 226 App. Div. 721 (1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLE v. BAGLIO,226 App. Div. 721(1929)
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SAMUEL BAGLIO,
Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
March, 1929.
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented aPage 722question of fact as to whether the defendant violated the statutefn*in the manner described in the complaint. All concur.
Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
  1. See Conservation Law, § 182, subd. 1, and § 185, subds. 1, 6, 8, added by Laws of 1912, chap. 318, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chaps. 350, 353, and Laws of 1927, chap. 106; since amd. by Laws of 1928, chaps. 242, 586, and Laws of 1929, chap. 275. — [REP. ↩