Opinion · Nylaw New York

PEOPLE EX REL. EIDT v. HYLAN, 199 App. Div. 965 (1921)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y. ex rel. CHARLES W. EIDT, Respondent,for a Writ of Mandamus against JOHN F. HYLAN & Others, Constituting theBoard of Estimate & Apportionment of the City of N.Y., Appellants., 199 A.D. 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1921)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1921-01-01
Topic: general

PEOPLE EX REL. EIDT v. HYLAN, 199 App. Div. 965 (1921) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CHARLES W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE EX REL. EIDT v. HYLAN, 199 App. Div. 965 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLE EX REL. EIDT v. HYLAN,199 App. Div. 965(1921)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CHARLES W. EIDT, Respondent,

for a Writ of Mandamus against JOHN F. HYLAN and Others, Constituting the

Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December, 1921.

Order modified in accordance with the views expressed inPeople ex rel. Cropseyv.Hylan[ante, p. 218], herewith handed down, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of the opinion in that case. Settle order on notice.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.