Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

PASSACANTILLI v. CHRYSLER LEASING, 260 So.2d 533 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1972)

ALBERT F. PASSACANTILLI, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CHRYSLER LEASINGCORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES., 260 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1972-04-24
Topic
general

PASSACANTILLI v. CHRYSLER LEASING, 260 So.2d 533 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1972) ALBERT F. PASSACANTILLI, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CHRYSLER LEASINGCORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 70-1205.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PASSACANTILLI v. CHRYSLER LEASING, 260 So.2d 533 (Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1972). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PASSACANTILLI v. CHRYSLER LEASING,260 So.2d 533(Fla.App. 3 Dist. 1972)
ALBERT F. PASSACANTILLI, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CHRYSLER LEASING
CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES.
No. 70-1205.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 24, 1972.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County, J. Fritz Gordon, Judge.
Fuller, Brumer, Moss Cohen, Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp Ware and Robert C. Lane, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Robert L. Dube, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.
ORDER ON MANDATE
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida filed in this cause on February 9, 1972 (259 So.2d 1), the mandate of this court heretofore issued on June 18, 1971 is withdrawn, the prior opinion and judgment of this court filed June 1, 1971 (249 So.2d 518) is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the order of dismissal of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, appealed from herein is reversed with instructions to reinstate the cause. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.)