Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

PAMPAS v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 247 La. 344 (1965)

ROBERT M. PAMPAS, INDIVIDUALLY & FOR THE USE & BENEFIT OF HIS MINORSON, ROBERT M. PAMPAS, JR. v. CAMBRIDGE Mut. FIRE Ins. COMPANY., 170 So. 2d 865 (La. 1965)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1965-02-05
Topic: general

PAMPAS v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 247 La. 344 (1965) 170 So.2d 865 ROBERT M. PAMPAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HIS MINORSON, ROBERT M. PAMPAS, JR. v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PAMPAS v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 247 La. 344 (1965). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PAMPAS v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,247 La. 344(1965)

170 So.2d 865

ROBERT M. PAMPAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HIS MINOR

SON, ROBERT M. PAMPAS, JR. v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 47585.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 5, 1965.

IN RE: ROBERT M. PAMPAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HIS MINOR SON, ROBERT M. PAMPAS, JR., APPLYING FOR CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF REVIEW, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. BERNARD.

[1] Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

[2] HAWTHORNE, J., thinks the writ should be granted.

[3] SANDERS and SUMMERS, JJ., are of the opinion that the writ should be granted.