Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
OSTERMAN v. SHINSEKI, 333 Fed.Appx. 524 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Dale A. OSTERMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Sec’y ofVeterans Affs., Respondent-Appellee., 333 F. App'x 524 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-05-22
- Topic
- general
OSTERMAN v. SHINSEKI, 333 Fed.Appx. 524 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Dale A. OSTERMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed OSTERMAN v. SHINSEKI, 333 Fed.Appx. 524 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
OSTERMAN v. SHINSEKI,333 Fed.Appx. 524(Fed. Cir. 2009)
Dale A. OSTERMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 2009-7080.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 22, 2009.
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 06-1599, Robert N. Davis, Judge.
Dale A. Osterman, Eugene, OR, pro se.
Scott Thomas Palmer, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
Scott Thomas Palmer, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
ORDER
The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is
ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩