Opinion · Alabama Court Opinions

O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 232 Ala. 355 (1936)

John M. O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM., 168 So. 209 (Ala. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Alabama Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Alabama
Date: 1936-05-14
Topic: general

O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 232 Ala. 355 (1936) 168 So. 209 John M. O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. 6 Div. 948.Supreme Court of Alabama. May 14, 1936.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 232 Ala. 355 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM,232 Ala. 355(1936)

168 So. 209

John M. O'ROURKE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

6 Div. 948.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 14, 1936.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Robert F. Proctor, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

W. J. Wynn and John S. Foster, both of Birmingham, for repondent.

BOULDIN, Justice.

Petition of John M. O'Rourke for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in O'Rourke v. City of Birmingham, 168 So. 206.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.