Opinion · Nylaw New York

O'HALLERAN v. QUEENSBORO LUMBER CO., INC., 270 App. Div. 1043 (1946)

PATRICIA O'HALLERAN, an Infant, by PATRICK O'HALLERAN, Her Guardian adLitem, et al., Respondents, v. QUEENSBORO LUMBER CO., INC., Defendant;TECHNICAL APPLIANCE Corp., Appellant-Respondent, & CHARLES J.H.GIMPEL et al., Doing Bus. as CHARLES H. GIMPEL, Appellants., 270 A.D. 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1946)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1946-06-24
Topic
general

O'HALLERAN v. QUEENSBORO LUMBER CO., INC., 270 App. Div. 1043 (1946) PATRICIA O'HALLERAN, an Infant, by PATRICK O'HALLERAN, Her Guardian adLitem, et al., Respondents, v. QUEENSBORO LUMBER CO., INC., Defendant;TECHNICAL APPLIANCE CORPORATION, Appellant-Respondent, and CHARLES J.H.GIMPEL et al., Doing Business as CHARLES H. GIMPEL, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed O'HALLERAN v. QUEENSBORO LUMBER CO., INC., 270 App. Div. 1043 (1946). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.