Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

NEYMAN v. SOUTTER, 417 Pa. 634 (1965)

Neyman, Appellant v. Soutter., 209 A.2d 430 (Pa. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
1965-05-03
Topic
general

NEYMAN v. SOUTTER, 417 Pa. 634 (1965) 209 A.2d 430 Neyman, Appellant v. Soutter.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.March 22, 1965. May 3, 1965. Before BELL, C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NEYMAN v. SOUTTER, 417 Pa. 634 (1965). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NEYMAN v. SOUTTER,417 Pa. 634(1965)
209 A.2d 430
Neyman, Appellant v. Soutter.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 22, 1965.
May 3, 1965.
Before BELL, C. J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.
Appeal, No. 128, March T., 1965, from order of Superior Court, April T., 1964, No. 241, affirming orderPage 635of Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1961, No. 1225, in case of Bartholomew Neyman v. Harry Reese Walter Soutter, Erma Soutter and Katherine R. Soutter. Judgment affirmed.

Same case in Superior Court:205 Pa. Super. 8.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before WEIR, J.

Voluntary nonsuit entered as to defendant, K. Soutter; verdict for plaintiff in amount of $7,500 compensatory damages entered against defendants H. Soutter and E. Soutter, and $5,000 punitive damages entered against defendant, H. Soutter; defendants' motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial refused and judgment entered on the verdict. Defendant, E. Soutter, appealed to Superior Court which reversed judgment, opinion by FLOOD, J. Appeal to Supreme Court allowed.
Robert Palkovitz, with himDavid S. Palkovitz, JackPalkovitz, andPalkovitz and Palkovitz, for appellant.Ines W. Cordisco, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 3, 1965:
Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice MUSMANNO dissents.Page 1