Opinion · Nylaw New York

MURTHA v. DUELL, 223 App. Div. 713 (1928)

MARGARET MURTHA, Doing Bus., etc., Plaintiff, v. MABEL H. DUELL andAnother, Appellants, Impleaded, etc., & MORRIS M. URIS, Respondent., 223 A.D. 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1928-01-01
Topic: general

MURTHA v. DUELL, 223 App. Div. 713 (1928) MARGARET MURTHA, Doing Business, etc., Plaintiff, v. MABEL H. DUELL andAnother, Appellants, Impleaded, etc., and MORRIS M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MURTHA v. DUELL, 223 App. Div. 713 (1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MURTHA v. DUELL,223 App. Div. 713(1928)

MARGARET MURTHA, Doing Business, etc., Plaintiff, v. MABEL H. DUELL and

Another, Appellants, Impleaded, etc., and MORRIS M. URIS, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

February, 1928.

Order modified by reducing the amount thereof by the sum of $218.90, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the evidence supporting the claim for extra work was stricken from the record. Findings inconsistent with this determination should be reversed. Settle order on notice.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.