Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
MURPHY v. WAKELEE, 243 Conn. 956 (1997)
MICHELLE MURPHY, CONSERVATOR (ESTATE OF PAUL SYLVAN) v. GEORGE WAKELEE, 704 A.2d 805 (Conn. 1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1997-12-10
- Topic
- general
MURPHY v. WAKELEE, 243 Conn. 956 (1997) 704 A.2d 805 MICHELLE MURPHY, CONSERVATOR (ESTATE OF PAUL SYLVAN) v. GEORGE WAKELEESupreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 425 (AC 15849), is, on reconsideration, granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding the parties' burden of proof with respect to the duties of the defendant fiduciary?" McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. A.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MURPHY v. WAKELEE, 243 Conn. 956 (1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding the parties' burden of proof with respect to the duties of the defendant fiduciary?"
McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.A. Paul Spinella, in support of the petition.James E. Coyne, in opposition.