Opinion · Fllaw Florida

MURPHY v. STATE, 234 So.2d 385 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1970)

234 So.2d 385

Type: Opinion
Court: Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction: Fllaw
Date: 1970-04-15
Topic: general

MURPHY v. STATE, 234 So.2d 385 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1970) JACK MURPHY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. No. 70-10.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 15, 1970.Rehearing Denied May 20, 1970.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MURPHY v. STATE, 234 So.2d 385 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1970). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MURPHY v. STATE,234 So.2d 385(Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1970)

JACK MURPHY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

No. 70-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Harvey S. Swickle, of Jack R. Nageley Law Offices, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly reviewed each of the fifteen points presented for our review by the appellant's brief and the pertinent portions of the record. On the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no error has been demonstrated by the appellant. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C.J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.Page 386