Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
MOTION DOCKET, 93 Ohio St.3d 1453 (2001)
MOTION DOCKET, 93 Ohio St.3d 1453 (2001), 756 N.E.2d 116 (Ohio 2001)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 2001-01-01
- Topic
- general
MOTION DOCKET, 93 Ohio St.3d 1453 (2001) 756 N.E.2d 116Supreme Court of Ohio. 2001. MOTION DOCKET Announcement Thursday October 11, 2001.01-1429. State v. Mink. Montgomery C.P.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 93 Ohio St.3d 1453 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MOTION DOCKET,93 Ohio St.3d 1453(2001)
756 N.E.2d 116
Supreme Court of Ohio.
2001.
MOTION DOCKET
Announcement Thursday October 11, 2001.
Montgomery C.P. No. 2000CR2900. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to transmit the record,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time to transmit the record be, and hereby is, granted, and the time for transmitting the record is extended to November 8, 2001.
01-1429. State v. Mink.
Montgomery C.P. No. 2000CR2900. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for stay of execution of death sentence pending disposition of this appeal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted.