Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MOTION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1429 (2001)

741 N.E.2d 893

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 2001-01-01
Topic: general

MOTION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1429 (2001) 741 N.E.2d 893Supreme Court of Ohio. 2001. MOTION DOCKET98-640. State v. Stallings. Summit C.P.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1429 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOTION DOCKET,91 Ohio St.3d 1429(2001)

741 N.E.2d 893

Supreme Court of Ohio.

2001.

MOTION DOCKET98-640. State v. Stallings. Summit C.P. No. CR97051118A. On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(5). Application denied.

00-841. Strongsville Bd. of Edn. v. Lawrence.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-351.Sua sponte, cause combined for oral argument and decision with 00-842,Ehrnfelt v. Lawrence, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-350.00-842. Ehrnfelt v. Lawrence.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-350.Sua sponte, cause combined for oral argument and decision with 00-841,Strongsville Bd. ofEdn. v. Lawrence, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-351.00-1833. State v. Jordan.

Lucas C.P. No. CR98-2736. On motion to withdraw as co-counsel by Pamela J. Prude-Smithers and motion for appointment of co-counsel. Motions granted and Ann Baronas is appointed.00-2157. State v. Wozniak.

Franklin App. No. 00AP-349. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following issue:

"Does R.C.2950.09(B)(2) unconstitutionally violate the doctrine of the separation of powers when itPage 1430prescribes particular factors which a trial judge must consider in determining whether a person is a sexual predator?"

Douglas, J., dissents.

Cause consolidated with 00-2014,State v. Wozniak, Franklin App. No. 00AP-349, and cause held for the decision in 00-1555,State v. Thompson, Montgomery App. No. 17984; briefing schedule stayed.00-2187. DeCastro v. Wellston City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Jackson App. No. 00CA06. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue "whether nominal damages can be recovered where actual monetary damages cannot be proven in a breach of contract claim."

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Cause consolidated with 00-1853,DeCastro v. Wellston CitySchool Dist. Bd. of Edn., Jackson App. No. 00CA06.

The conflict cases areMunoz v. Flower Hosp. (1985),30 Ohio App.3d 162, 30 OBR 303,507 N.E.2d 360;Textron Fin. Corp. v.Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (1996),115 Ohio App.3d 137,684 N.E.2d 1261; andHackathorn v. Springfield Local School Dist. (1994),94 Ohio App.3d 319,640 N.E.2d 882.00-2264. State v. Singleton.

Cuyahoga App. No. 76357. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.00-2282. State v. Clark.

Montgomery App. No. 18314. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.00-2308. State v. Woodson.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1235. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.00-2335. Porritt v. Howard.

Lucas App. No. L-00-1259. On amended motion for stay of court of appeals' decision. Motion denied.01-24. State v. Burns.

Montgomery App. No. 11216. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.01-26. State v. Montgomery.

Franklin App. No. 99AP-750. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.01-68. Wyper v. Wyper.

Lucas App. No. L-99-1378. On motion for immediate stay of the court of appeals' judgment. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.