Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MOTION DOCKET, 88 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2000)

MOTION DOCKET, 88 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2000), 723 N.E.2d 119 (Ohio 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 2000-01-01
Topic: general

MOTION DOCKET, 88 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2000) 723 N.E.2d 119Supreme Court of Ohio. 2000. MOTION DOCKET Announcement Wednesday February 2, 2000 91-1795. State v. Thrower. Summit App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 88 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOTION DOCKET,88 Ohio St.3d 1413(2000)

723 N.E.2d 119

Supreme Court of Ohio.

2000.

MOTION DOCKET

Announcement Wednesday February 2, 2000

91-1795. State v. Thrower.

Summit App. No. 14967. On motion fornunc pro tuncorder correcting order. Motion denied.

COOK, J., not participating.97-1390. State v. Cornwell.

Mahoning C.P. No. 96CR525. On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(5). Application denied.98-1714. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97APD06-859. On request for oral argument. Request denied.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.99-1198. State ex rel. Grendell v. Davidson.

In Mandamus. This cause came on for consideration upon respondents' itemization of attorney fees and expenses and submission of additional evidence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that relators' attorneys, Timothy J. Grendell and Gerald W. Phillips, pay respondents $6,366.33 for reasonable expenses and the approximate amount of compensation and fringe benefits for legal services incurred by respondents in defending against their frivolous claims. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5).99-1696. Mun. Micro Computer Sys., Inc. v. Madonia.

Cuyahoga App. No. 76380. On motion for perpetual injunction. Motion denied.99-2046. State v. Duncan.

Fairfield App. No. 99CA32. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists;suasponte, cause consolidated with 99-2012,State v. Duncan, Fairfield App. No. 99CA32; cause held for the decision in 99-1855 and 99-1960,State v. Moore, Fairfield App. No. 99CA24; and briefing schedule stayed.

COOK, J., dissents.99-2186. Shealy v. Phillips.

Crawford App. No. 3-99-15. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed November 30, 1999, at page 1:

"The issue upon which the conflict exists is whether, in a case involving a claim of negligenceper sebased upon a violation of Ohio's Assured Clear Distance statute, a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction with regard to the defense of comparative negligence based upon evidence that the plaintiff suddenly entered the path or lane of travel of the defendant."

MOYER, C.J., dissents.Page 1414

PFEIFER, J., not participating.

The conflict case isHooven v. Four Star Produce, Inc.(Dec. 10, 1992), Cuyahoga App. No. 63628, unreported, 1992 WL 369203.