Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
MOTION DOCKET, 72 Ohio St.3d 1536 (1995)
72 Ohio St.3d 1536
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 1995-01-01
- Topic
- general
MOTION DOCKET, 72 Ohio St.3d 1536 (1995) 650 N.E.2d 476-481Supreme Court of Ohio. 1995. MOTION DOCKET Monday, June 12, 1995 95-976. State v. Yeagley. Wayne County, No. 2895.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOTION DOCKET, 72 Ohio St.3d 1536 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MOTION DOCKET,72 Ohio St.3d 1536(1995)
650 N.E.2d 476-481
Supreme Court of Ohio.
1995.
Monday, June 12, 1995
95-976.State v. Yeagley.Wayne County, No. 2895. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for stay,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied, effective June 9, 1995.
WRIGHT, J., dissents.95-1108.State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to expedite hearing,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to expedite hearing be, and hereby is, denied, effective June 9, 1995.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court,sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before June 23, 1995; relators shall file their brief within seven days after the filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief(s) within seven days after the filing of relators' brief; and relators shall file their reply brief, if any, within three days after the filing of respondents' brief(s).Page 1537