Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MORGAN v. DEPT. OF ENERGY, 329 Fed.Appx. 280 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
329 Fed.Appx. 280
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-07-22
- Topic
- general
MORGAN v. DEPT. OF ENERGY, 329 Fed.Appx. 280 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Charles G. MORGAN, Petitioner, v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MORGAN v. DEPT. OF ENERGY, 329 Fed.Appx. 280 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MORGAN v. DEPT. OF ENERGY,329 Fed.Appx. 280(Fed. Cir. 2009)
Charles G. MORGAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent.
No. 2008-3306.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 22, 2009.
On Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board, in Case No. SE1221020082-M-3.Page 281
Richard Segerblom, Richard Segerblom, Ltd., of Las Vegas, NV, argued for petitioner.
Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.
Jane W. Vanneman, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.
NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED.SeeFed. Cir. R. 36.
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED.SeeFed. Cir. R. 36.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩