Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC., 280 Conn. 924 (2006)

GEBREHIWET MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC, 908 A.2d 1088 (Conn. 2006)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2006-10-10
Topic: general

MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC., 280 Conn. 924 (2006) 908 A.2d 1088 GEBREHIWET MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INCSupreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 625 (AC 25700), is denied. BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC., 280 Conn. 924 (2006). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC.,280 Conn. 924(2006)

908 A.2d 1088

GEBREHIWET MOKONNEN v. PRO PARK, INC

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,96 Conn. App. 625(AC 25700), is denied.

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

John T. Bochanis,in support of the petition.David S. Rintoul,in opposition.

Decided October 10, 2006