Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

MERIT DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1994)

70 Ohio St.3d 1464

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 1994-01-01
Topic: general

MERIT DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1994) 640 N.E.2d 526-530Supreme Court of Ohio. 1994. MERIT DOCKET Wednesday, October 19, 1994 93-2045. State ex rel. Sweet v. Hancock Cty.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MERIT DOCKET, 70 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MERIT DOCKET,70 Ohio St.3d 1464(1994)

640 N.E.2d 526-530

Supreme Court of Ohio.

1994.

MERIT DOCKET

Wednesday, October 19, 1994

93-2045.State ex rel. Sweet v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Elections.Hancock County, No. 5-93-15.Sua sponte, cause dismissed as moot.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1586.Crosby v. Baker. In Habeas Corpus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1749.State ex rel. Brown v. Littlefield. In Habeas Corpus.Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1842.In re Manogg. In Habeas Corpus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1848.State ex rel. Vasquez v. Markovitch. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1875.State ex rel. Cotton v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1880.State ex rel. LaGuta v. Fuerst. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1888.State ex rel. Watts v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1921.State ex rel. Scott v. McGinty. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1937.State ex rel. Persley v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.94-1950.State ex rel. Foster v. McAninch. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.Page 1465