Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF WITTNER, 291 N.Y. 574 (1943)

In the Matter of SIDNEY M. WITTNER, an Att’y, Appellant. Ass’n OFTHE BAR OF THE CITY OF N.Y., Respondent., 50 N.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1943-07-20
Topic: general

MATTER OF WITTNER, 291 N.Y. 574 (1943) 50 N.E.2d 660 In the Matter of SIDNEY M. WITTNER, an Attorney, Appellant. ASSOCIATION OFTHE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 24, 1943 Decided July 20, 1943 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. I. Maurice Wormser, Samuel Bader and Lloyd Paul Stryker for appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF WITTNER, 291 N.Y. 574 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF WITTNER,291 N.Y. 574(1943)

50 N.E.2d 660

In the Matter of SIDNEY M. WITTNER, an Attorney, Appellant. ASSOCIATION OF

THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued May 24, 1943

Decided July 20, 1943

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

I. Maurice Wormser, Samuel BaderandLloyd Paul Strykerfor appellant.Einar Chrystiefor respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: LEHMAN, Ch. J.