Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF ROCKWELL v. MORRIS, 10 N.Y.2d 749 (1961)

In the Matter of GEORGE L. ROCKWELL, Respondent, v. NEWBOLD MORRIS, asCommissioner of Parks of the City of N.Y., Appellant., 219 N.Y.S.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1961)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1961-07-07
Topic
general

MATTER OF ROCKWELL v. MORRIS, 10 N.Y.2d 749 (1961) 219 N.Y.S.2d 605, 177 N.E.2d 48 In the Matter of GEORGE L. ROCKWELL, Respondent, v. NEWBOLD MORRIS, asCommissioner of Parks of the City of New York, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted July 6, 1961 Decided July 7, 1961 Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Respondent contended that the refusal of the Commissioner of Parks of the City of New York to issue a permit to respondent to speak in a park under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Parks constituted a violation of respondent's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF ROCKWELL v. MORRIS, 10 N.Y.2d 749 (1961). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF ROCKWELLv.MORRIS,10 N.Y.2d 749(1961)
219 N.Y.S.2d 605,177 N.E.2d 48
In the Matter of GEORGE L. ROCKWELL, Respondent,v.NEWBOLD MORRIS, as
Commissioner of Parks of the City of New York, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted July 6, 1961
Decided July 7, 1961
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Respondent contended that the refusal of the Commissioner of Parks of the City of New York to issue a permit to respondent to speak in a park under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Parks constituted a violation of respondent's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was such a violation.