Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF COMM. OF INVST., ST. OF N.Y. v. LOMBARDOZZI, 6 N.Y.2d 878 (1959)

In the Matter of Comm’n OF INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,Respondent, against CARMINE LOMBARDOZZI & COSTENZE PETER VALENTI,Appellants., 160 N.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1959)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1959-05-29
Topic
general

MATTER OF COMM. OF INVST., ST. OF N.Y. v. LOMBARDOZZI, 6 N.Y.2d 878 (1959) 160 N.E.2d 125, 188 N.Y.S.2d 996 In the Matter of the COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,Respondent, against CARMINE LOMBARDOZZI and COSTENZE PETER VALENTI,Appellants.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted May 25, 1959 Decided May 29, 1959 Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, on behalf of appellant Lombardozzi, there were presented and necessarily passed upon the following questions, viz.: (1) Whether the procedure whereby this appellant was committed violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) whether the privileges and rights of this appellant not to be compelled to incriminate himself under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution were improperly infringed; and (3) whether the over-all effects of the proceedings violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF COMM. OF INVST., ST. OF N.Y. v. LOMBARDOZZI, 6 N.Y.2d 878 (1959). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
MATTER OF COMM. OF INVST., ST. OF N.Y. v. LOMBARDOZZI,6 N.Y.2d 878(1959)
160 N.E.2d 125,188 N.Y.S.2d 996
In the Matter of the COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent, against CARMINE LOMBARDOZZI and COSTENZE PETER VALENTI,
Appellants.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted May 25, 1959
Decided May 29, 1959
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, onPage 879behalf of appellant Lombardozzi, there were presented and necessarily passed upon the following questions, viz.: (1) Whether the procedure whereby this appellant was committed violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; (2) whether the privileges and rights of this appellant not to be compelled to incriminate himself under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution were improperly infringed; and (3) whether the over-all effects of the proceedings violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. This court held that the rights and privileges of this appellant under the United States Constitution were not infringed or violated.