Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF CAIOLA, 67 A.D.2d 896 [1st Dept 1979]

In the Matter of BENEDICT A. CAIOLA, Admitted as BENEDICT ANTHONY CAIOLA, anAttorney., 67 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1979-01-01
Topic
general

MATTER OF CAIOLA, 67 A.D.2d 896 [1st Dept 1979] In the Matter of BENEDICT A. CAIOLA, Admitted as BENEDICT ANTHONY CAIOLA, anAttorney.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. February 27, 1979Republished Motions granted and respondent is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF CAIOLA, 67 A.D.2d 896 [1st Dept 1979]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF CAIOLA,67 A.D.2d 896[1st Dept 1979]
In the Matter of BENEDICT A. CAIOLA, Admitted as BENEDICT ANTHONY CAIOLA, an
Attorney.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
February 27, 1979
Republished
Motions granted and respondent is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.