Opinion · Nylaw New York
MASSARO v. PACIFICO, 275 App. Div. 844 (1949)
CLAUDETTE MASSARO, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, LOUIS MASSARO, etal., Appellants, v. VINCENT PACIFICO, Respondent., 275 A.D. 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1949)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1949-05-09
- Topic
- general
MASSARO v. PACIFICO, 275 App. Div. 844 (1949) CLAUDETTE MASSARO, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, LOUIS MASSARO, etal., Appellants, v. VINCENT PACIFICO, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May 9, 1949.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MASSARO v. PACIFICO, 275 App. Div. 844 (1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MASSARO v. PACIFICO,275 App. Div. 844(1949)
CLAUDETTE MASSARO, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, LOUIS MASSARO, et
al., Appellants, v. VINCENT PACIFICO, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 9, 1949.
Present — Nolan, P.J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.