Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
MARETZ v. 595 CORPORATE CIRCLE, 253 Conn. 906 (2000)
LEVEY MILLER MARETZ v. 595 Corp. CIRCLE, 753 A.2d 941 (Conn. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2000-05-04
- Topic
- general
MARETZ v. 595 CORPORATE CIRCLE, 253 Conn. 906 (2000) 753 A.2d 941 LEVEY MILLER MARETZ v. 595 CORPORATE CIRCLE ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 815 (AC 18716), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a real estate listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 20-325a on the ground that the signatures of the general partners of the partnership ownership of the property were not acknowledged and witnessed? "2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the amendments to General Statutes § 20-325a, enacted by No. 94-240 of the 1994 Public Acts, did not apply to real estate listing agreements signed prior to the effective date?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16304.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MARETZ v. 595 CORPORATE CIRCLE, 253 Conn. 906 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a real estate listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) §20-325aon the ground that the signatures of the general partners of the partnership ownership of the property were not acknowledged and witnessed?Page 907
"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the amendments to General Statutes §20-325a, enacted by No. 94-240 of the 1994 Public Acts, did not apply to real estate listing agreements signed prior to the effective date?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16304.Edwin L. Doernberger, in support of the petition.James C. Graham, in opposition.