Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey
MALDONADO v. LEEDS, 180 N.J. 147 (2004)
BARBARA MALDONADO, INDIVIDUALLY & AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF JOSECONCEPCION, JR., PLAINTIFF, v. T'CHAD LEEDS, DEFENDANT-MOVANT,AND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, & CITY OFPATERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT., 849 A.2d 181 (N.J. 2004)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Njlaw New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- Njlaw
- Date
- 2004-04-26
- Topic
- general
MALDONADO v. LEEDS, 180 N.J. 147 (2004) 849 A.2d 181 BARBARA MALDONADO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF JOSECONCEPCION, JR., PLAINTIFF, v. T'CHAD LEEDS, DEFENDANT-MOVANT,AND CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST LDS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND CITY OFPATERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 26, 2004 ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to reconsider in light of Buono v. Scalia, 179 N.J. 131, 843 A.2d 1120 (2004).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MALDONADO v. LEEDS, 180 N.J. 147 (2004). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Jurisdiction is not retained.