Opinion · Nylaw New York

MAJESTIC MFG. CORP. v. L. RISO SONS BLDG. CO., 261 App. Div. 1099 (1941)

MAJESTIC Mfg. CORP., Appellant, v. L. RISO SONS Bldg. Co.,INC., Defendant, & IRVING KERSTEIN & Others, Copartners, Trading asJOSEPH KERSTEIN Co., Respondents., 261 A.D. 1099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1941)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1941-04-21
Topic: general

MAJESTIC MFG. CORP. v. L. RISO SONS BLDG. CO., 261 App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MAJESTIC MFG. CORP. v. L. RISO SONS BLDG. CO., 261 App. Div. 1099 (1941). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MAJESTIC MFG. CORP. v. L. RISO SONS BLDG. CO.,261 App. Div. 1099(1941)

MAJESTIC MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellant, v. L. RISO SONS BUILDING Co.,

INC., Defendant, and IRVING KERSTEIN and Others, Copartners, Trading as

JOSEPH KERSTEIN Co., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

April 21, 1941.

Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Order granting respondents' motion for summary judgment and judgment entered pursuant thereto dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.