Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

LYNCH v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, 3 N.J. 374 (1949)

GRACE LYNCH, Gen. Adm’r, Adm’x, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITEDFRUIT Co., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER., 70 A.2d 537 (N.J. 1949)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1949-10-31
Topic: general

LYNCH v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, 3 N.J. 374 (1949) 70 A.2d 537 GRACE LYNCH, GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITEDFRUIT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 31, 1949. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LYNCH v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, 3 N.J. 374 (1949). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LYNCH v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY,3 N.J. 374(1949)

70 A.2d 537

GRACE LYNCH, GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED

FRUIT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

October 31, 1949.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. O'Mara, Conway SchumannandMr. Gerald F. O'Mara, for the petitioner.Mr. Nathan Bakerfor the respondent.

Granted.