Opinion · Nylaw New York
LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. ALLOCCO, 227 App. Div. 789 (1929)
LOTOS OIL & Distrib. Corp., Respondent, v. ANDREW ALLOCCO andAnother, Defendants, Impleaded with ADELPHIA ALLOCCO, Appellant., 227 A.D. 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1929-01-01
- Topic
- general
LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. ALLOCCO, 227 App. Div. 789 (1929) LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ANDREW ALLOCCO andAnother, Defendants, Impleaded with ADELPHIA ALLOCCO, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. November, 1929.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. ALLOCCO, 227 App. Div. 789 (1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. ALLOCCO,227 App. Div. 789(1929)
LOTOS OIL AND DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ANDREW ALLOCCO and
Another, Defendants, Impleaded with ADELPHIA ALLOCCO, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
November, 1929.
Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.