Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO. v. McCONNELL, 121 N.J.L. 583 (1939)

LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO., APPELLANT, v. MARY J. McCONNELL, RESPONDENT., 3 A.2d 581 (Ct. Err. & App. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1939-01-13
Topic: general

LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO. v. McCONNELL, 121 N.J.L. 583 (1939) 3 A.2d 581 LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO., APPELLANT, v. MARY J. McCONNELL, RESPONDENT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 28, 1938 — Decided January 13, 1939. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in120 N.J.L. 428.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO. v. McCONNELL, 121 N.J.L. 583 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO. v. McCONNELL,121 N.J.L. 583(1939)

3 A.2d 581

LEHIGH NAVIGATION COAL CO., APPELLANT, v. MARY J. McCONNELL, RESPONDENT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.

Submitted October 28, 1938 —

Decided January 13, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in120 N.J.L. 428.

For the appellant,Maurice J. McKeown.

For the respondent,John C. Stockel.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 13.For reversal— None.