Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

LEE v. CHAMBLEE, 224 N.C. 858 (1944)

29 S.E.2d 680

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1944-01-01
Topic: general

LEE v. CHAMBLEE, 224 N.C. 858 (1944) 29 S.E.2d 680 H. J. LEE v. M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LEE v. CHAMBLEE, 224 N.C. 858 (1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LEEv. CHAMBLEE,224 N.C. 858(1944)

29 S.E.2d 680

H. J. LEE v. M. V. CHAMBLEE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

(Filed 19 April, 1944.)

APPEAL by plaintiff fromHarris, J., at October Term, 1943, of WILSON.

Simms Simms and J. M. Templeton for plaintiff, appellant.Bunn Arendell for defendant, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff asked for recovery upon a negotiable note bearing the signature of defendant and others, and apparently under seal. The defendant pleaded suretyship and also denied that he had adopted as his own the seal appearing after his signature, and pleaded the three-year statute of limitations. Upon the evidence adduced, and after appropriate instructions by the court, the jury answered the issues favorably to defendant's contentions and judgment was rendered accordingly. Plaintiff appealed.

The trial was in all respects well within the standards of correct procedure. We hesitate to burden the Reports with a formal opinion, especially since over-writing the subject could only result in needless repetition, and variant expressions might lead to confusion. This case is controlled byFlippen v. Lindsey,221 N.C. 30,18 S.E.2d 824, and authorities there cited. We find

No error.Page 859