Opinion · Nylaw New York

LAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 266 App. Div. 959 (1943)

266 App. Div. 959

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1943-10-22
Topic
general

LAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 266 App. Div. 959 (1943) EDGAR J. LAUER et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, and NEWYORK STEAM CORPORATION, Impleaded Defendant, Appellant, et al., Defendants.PEGGY H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 266 App. Div. 959 (1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK,266 App. Div. 959(1943)
EDGAR J. LAUER et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, and NEW
YORK STEAM CORPORATION, Impleaded Defendant, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
PEGGY H. CARSON, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
ELSIE M. RHEINSTROM et al., Respondents, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME,
Defendants.
EDITH D. LAMBERT, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
THELMA DE LOREZ, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
EMMA R. LOENGARD et al., Respondents, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME,
Defendants.
ELSIE E. BURNHAM, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
THE MADISON INCORPORATED et al., Respondents, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME,
Defendants.
MADAME C. CHAMAY, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
FRANK E. KING, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
RENE A. SICHEL, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
SARAH ELKUS, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
LOIS D. WURTELE, Plaintiff, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
LADISLAS HERMANN, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
MERINDA LEITH, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
ARTHUR GAINES, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
BLANCHE B. ELSINGER, Plaintiff, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
HENRY KAUFMANN, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellants, and SAME, Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
October 22, 1943.
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs-respondents against the defendant, New York Steam Corporation, and with costs and disbursements to defendant, New York Steam Corporation against the City of New York. No opinion.
Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.