Opinion · Nylaw New York

KREFETZ v. GOTTLIEB, 204 App. Div. 838 (1922)

FRANK KREFETZ, Respondent, v. GEORGE GOTTLIEB & Another, Appellants., 204 A.D. 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1922)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1922-01-01
Topic: general

KREFETZ v. GOTTLIEB, 204 App. Div. 838 (1922) FRANK KREFETZ, Respondent, v. GEORGE GOTTLIEB and Another, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. November, 1922.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KREFETZ v. GOTTLIEB, 204 App. Div. 838 (1922). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KREFETZ v. GOTTLIEB,204 App. Div. 838(1922)

FRANK KREFETZ, Respondent, v. GEORGE GOTTLIEB and Another, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

November, 1922.

Motion for extension of time to answer granted, on condition that the case be brought on for argument on Friday, November 17, 1922; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Blackmar, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ.