Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

KOCIENDA et ux. v. PATE CONSTRUCTION INC., 287 Pa. Super. 592 (1980)

Kocienda et ux. v. Pate Constr. Inc., Appellant., 428 A.2d 253 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
1980-06-20
Topic
general

KOCIENDA et ux. v. PATE CONSTRUCTION INC., 287 Pa. Super. 592 (1980) 428 A.2d 253 Kocienda et ux. v. Pate Construction Inc., Appellant.Superior Court of Pennsylvania.Submitted March 21, 1980. June 20, 1980.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KOCIENDA et ux. v. PATE CONSTRUCTION INC., 287 Pa. Super. 592 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KOCIENDA et ux. v. PATE CONSTRUCTION INC.,287 Pa. Super. 592(1980)
428 A.2d 253
Kocienda et ux. v. Pate Construction Inc., Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted March 21, 1980.
June 20, 1980.
Civil proceeding. Assumpsit. Before THOMSON, J. No. 1839 Oct. T., 1979. Appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Pike County, Mar. T., 1978, No. 41. Submitted March 21, 1980.
John P. Lawler, for appellant;

Randolph T. Borden, for appellees.
Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.
Although we find no merit to this appeal, nevertheless, the appeal is quashed for the reason that no valid judgment has been entered and hence the appeal is premature.