Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

KEY TITLE COMPANY v. OREY, 47 Or. App. 17 (1980)

613 P.2d 111

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1980-07-14
Topic
general

KEY TITLE COMPANY v. OREY, 47 Or. App. 17 (1980) 613 P.2d 111 KEY TITLE COMPANY, Respondent, v. OREY, et ux, Appellants. No. 5759, CA 16902Oregon Court of Appeals.Argued and submitted May 28, 1980 Affirmed July 14, 1980 Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KEY TITLE COMPANY v. OREY, 47 Or. App. 17 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KEY TITLE COMPANY v. OREY,47 Or. App. 17(1980)
613 P.2d 111
KEY TITLE COMPANY,Respondent,v. OREY, et ux,Appellants.
No. 5759, CA 16902
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Argued and submitted May 28, 1980
Affirmed July 14, 1980
Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County.

Charles P. Littlehales, Judge.
James H. Lewelling, Newport, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.

James M. Gillis, Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Litchfield, Macpherson, Carstens Gillis, Newport.
Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Affirmed.Page 18

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 19
PER CURIAM
There being no audio record, agreed narrative statement or typewritten transcript ordered or obtained of the proceedings below in accordance with ORS46.340and Rules 23.05 and 23.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure, there is an insufficient record for us to review the assignments of error made.

Affirmed.Page 20

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 21