Opinion · Nylaw New York

KERSHNER v. KERSHNER, 269 N.Y. 655 (1936)

DAVID KERSHNER, Appellant, v. LILLIAN KERSHNER, Respondent., 200 N.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-08
Topic: general

KERSHNER v. KERSHNER, 269 N.Y. 655 (1936) 200 N.E. 43 DAVID KERSHNER, Appellant, v. LILLIAN KERSHNER, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued December 11, 1935 Decided January 8, 1936 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] J.W. Friedman, Louis H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KERSHNER v. KERSHNER, 269 N.Y. 655 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KERSHNERv.KERSHNER,269 N.Y. 655(1936)

200 N.E. 43

DAVID KERSHNER, Appellant,v.LILLIAN KERSHNER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued December 11, 1935

Decided January 8, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.Page 656

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 657

J.W. Friedman, Louis H. SupnickandMyron Wisofffor appellant.Philip F. Rosenberg, Milton OlshanandPaul Seidermanfor respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs against plaintiff; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. Not sitting: CROUCH, J.