Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

KELLER v. WIDMAN, 515 Pa. 223 (1987)

Roland L. KELLER, Individually & as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. ofDorothy M. Mondell, Deceased, Appellee, v. J. Richard WIDMAN, Appellant., 527 A.2d 1008 (Pa. 1987)

Type: Opinion
Court: Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Palaw
Date: 1987-07-09
Topic: general

KELLER v. WIDMAN, 515 Pa. 223 (1987) 527 A.2d 1008 Roland L. KELLER, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate ofDorothy M. Mondell, Deceased, Appellee, v. J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KELLER v. WIDMAN, 515 Pa. 223 (1987). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KELLER v. WIDMAN,515 Pa. 223(1987)

527 A.2d 1008

Roland L. KELLER, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of

Dorothy M. Mondell, Deceased, Appellee, v. J. Richard WIDMAN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 2, 1986.

Decided July 9, 1987.

Appeal No. 3 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1986 from Order of Superior Court,343 Pa. Super. 625,494 A.2d 490(1985), entered February 1, 1985, at No. 934 Philadelphia 1983, reversing Order of Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County entered March 30, 1983, at No. 81-0560; Clinton W. Smith, Judge.

Robert A. Seiferth, Williamsport, for appellant.Page 224

Peter T. Campana, Williamsport, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.