Opinion · Nylaw New York

KEET v. MURRIN, 235 App. Div. 882 (1932)

EUGENE KEET, Respondent, v. HOWARD MURRIN, Appellant., 235 A.D. 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-01-01
Topic: general

KEET v. MURRIN, 235 App. Div. 882 (1932) EUGENE KEET, Respondent, v. HOWARD MURRIN, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. May, 1932.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KEET v. MURRIN, 235 App. Div. 882 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KEET v. MURRIN,235 App. Div. 882(1932)

EUGENE KEET, Respondent, v. HOWARD MURRIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

May, 1932.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except McNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant "settled" with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.