Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

JONES v. JAQUITH, 46 Or. App. 671 (1980)

612 P.2d 770

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1980-06-23
Topic
general

JONES v. JAQUITH, 46 Or. App. 671 (1980) 612 P.2d 770 RON JONES CO., Appellant, v. JAQUITH, et al, Respondents —Cross-Appellants. No. 107292, CA 14055Oregon Court of Appeals.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed JONES v. JAQUITH, 46 Or. App. 671 (1980). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

JONES v. JAQUITH,46 Or. App. 671(1980)
612 P.2d 770
RON JONES CO.,Appellant,v. JAQUITH, et al,Respondents —
Cross-Appellants.
No. 107292, CA 14055
Oregon Court of Appeals.
On appellant's and respondents — cross-appellants' reconsiderations
filed March 26, former opinion filed February 25 (44 Or. App. 727,
606 P.2d 1179), appellant's reconsideration is granted,
the former dissenting opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court,
reversed and remanded for entry of summary judgment for appellant,
respondents — cross-appellants' reconsideration denied June 23, 1980
In Bancfn*
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Duane R. Ertsgaard, Judge.
Thomas B. Brand, and Brand, Lee, Ferris Embick, Salem, for appellant's petition.

Valerie J. Vollmar, and Clark, Marsh Lindauer, Salem, for respondents — cross-appellants' petition.
PER CURIAM
Appellant's petition for reconsideration is granted. The former dissenting opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court. Respondents — cross-appellants' petition for reconsideration is denied. Reversed and remanded for entry of summary judgment for appellant.

Gillette, dissenting opinion.Page 672

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 673
GILLETTE, J.,dissenting.
Because I am still of the view expressed in our original opinion in this case, I respectfully dissent.

Roberts, J., joins in this dissent.Page 674

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 675
  1. Schwab, C. J., did not participate in this decision. ↩