Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC v. PETROZZA, 324 N.C. 327 (1989)

377 S.E.2d 750

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1989-01-01
Topic
general

IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC v. PETROZZA, 324 N.C. 327 (1989) 377 S.E.2d 750 IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC, P.A., A NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONALASSOCIATION v. JOSEPH A. PETROZZA, M.D. No. 573A88Supreme Court of North Carolina Filed 5 April 1989 APPEAL by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30 (2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 92 N.C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC v. PETROZZA, 324 N.C. 327 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC v. PETROZZA,324 N.C. 327(1989)
377 S.E.2d 750
IREDELL DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC, P.A., A NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATION v. JOSEPH A. PETROZZA, M.D.
No. 573A88
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed 5 April 1989
APPEAL by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S.7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,92 N.C. App. 21,373 S.E.2d 449(1988), affirming an order entered by Walker (R.G.), J., on 1 October 1987, in Superior Court, IREDELL County, denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 March 1989.
Pope, McMillan, Gourley, Kutteh Parker, by William P. Pope and Constantine H. Kutteh, II; and Hall and Brooks, by John E. Hall, for plaintiff-appellant.

Vannoy, Moore, Colvard, Triplett Freeman, by Anthony R. Triplett and James H. Early, Jr., for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.Page 328