Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

IN RE PEARSON, 309 Fed.Appx. 216 (10th Cir. 2009)

In re : Jimmy PEARSON; Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette LucilleCarlson, Debtors. Mark R. Stewart, Tr., Appellant, v. Jimmy Pearson;Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille Calrson, Appellees.United States of Am., Amicus Curiae., 309 F. App'x 216 (10th Cir. 2009)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2009-01-22
Topic
general

IN RE PEARSON, 309 Fed.Appx. 216 (10th Cir. 2009) In re: Jimmy PEARSON; Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette LucilleCarlson, Debtors. Mark R. Stewart, Trustee, Appellant, v. Jimmy Pearson;Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille Calrson, Appellees.United States of America, Amicus Curiae. No. 08-8060.United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE PEARSON, 309 Fed.Appx. 216 (10th Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN RE PEARSON,309 Fed.Appx. 216(10th Cir. 2009)
In re: Jimmy PEARSON; Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille
Carlson, Debtors. Mark R. Stewart, Trustee, Appellant, v. Jimmy Pearson;
Jeanette Lucille Pearson, a/k/a Jeanette Lucille Calrson, Appellees.
United States of America, Amicus Curiae.
No. 08-8060.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
January 22, 2009.
Mark R. Stewart, Cheyenne, WY, pro se.

Ken McCartney, Cheyenne, WY, for Appellee.

Robert J. Schneider, United States Department of Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, Newark, NJ, P. Matthew Sutko, Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, Washington, DC, Amicus Curiae.
Before KELLY, MURPHY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the "Appellees' Status Report and Suggestion of Mootness," and the responses filed by the appellant Trustee and amicus United States, the court orders this appealDISMISSEDas moot.

It is further ordered that the opinion of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (BAP), issued on July 28, 2008,390 B.R. 706, isVACATED.The matter is remanded to the BAP with instructions to vacate the bankruptcy court's ruling as to the vehicle-ownership-deduction issue and dismiss the BAP appeal.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩