Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE, 424 Fed.Appx. 952 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

In re CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENTLITIGATION. Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., & Anesta AG,Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mylan Pharms. Inc. & Mylan Inc.,Defendants-Appellants., 424 F. App'x 952 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2011-05-25
Topic
general

IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE, 424 Fed.Appx. 952 (Fed. Cir. 2011) In re CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENTLITIGATION. Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., and Anesta AG,Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.,Defendants-Appellants. No. 2011-1399.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE, 424 Fed.Appx. 952 (Fed. Cir. 2011). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN RE CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE,424 Fed.Appx. 952(Fed. Cir. 2011)
In re CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENT
LITIGATION. Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., and Anesta AG,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 2011-1399.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 25, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 09-MD-2118, Judge Sue L. Robinson.
William J. Marsden Jr., Fish Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

James H. Wallace Jr., Kevin P. Anderson, Robert J. Scheffel, Mark A. Pacella, Brian H. Pandya, Matthew J. Dowd, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.Page 953
Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
ON MOTION
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. submit a motion for a stay, pending appeal, of the injunction entered by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on May 24, 2011. Mylan also requests an immediate stay of the injunction pending disposition of its motion for a stay, pending appeal and for expedited briefing of the stay motion.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Eurand, Inc. et al. are directed to respond no later, than 12:00 p.m. on May 31, 2011.

(2) Mylan's request for an immediate stay is granted to the extent that the injunction is temporarily stayed pending the court's receipt of the response and the court's consideration of the papers submitted.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩